<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Intel on dev.endevour</title><link>https://devendevour.iankulin.com/tags/intel/</link><description>Recent content in Intel on dev.endevour</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-AU</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://devendevour.iankulin.com/tags/intel/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>CPU Comparisons</title><link>https://devendevour.iankulin.com/cpu-comparisons/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://devendevour.iankulin.com/cpu-comparisons/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devendevour.iankulin.com/images/cloud.jpg" alt="" class="img-responsive"&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I was a young whipper-snapper, working at the &amp;ldquo;data processing&amp;rdquo; centre, you could see if one CPU was better than another one by the CPU name/number. No one wanted an 8086 once the 286&amp;rsquo;s came out. Then a 386 was what you wanted for the latest multitasking support, but only till the 486 was available, then you wanted that for the gargantuan memory addressing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With that idea firmly in mind, I&amp;rsquo; wanted an i5 to be better than an i3, and an i7 better than all of them, but it&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/compare-different-cpus-right-way/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;apparently not that simple&lt;/a&gt; . I do come across people in forums talking about &amp;lsquo;generations&amp;rsquo; of Intel processors - so all this is probably decodable, but I&amp;rsquo;m not exactly sure how.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>